Nigerian House of Representatives Committee on Women Affairs and Social Development and the Minister of Women Affairs, Uju Kennedy-Ohaneye were engaged in open confrontation at the an investigative hearing into the alleged diversion of N1.5billion contract funds.
The committee had summoned Kennedy-Ohaneye to appear before it on Tuesday and explain the whereabouts of the money already released through Accountant-Generalās Office.
But a drama ensued when the committee started asking the Minister to give account of how monies meant for contractors paid by the Accountant General of the Federation were expended by the ministry.
In her response, Kennedy-Ohaneye said though 30 percent of the total sum meant for contractors was paid to her ministry but she couldnāt give account of how it was expended because the First Lady, Oluremi Tinubu had advised her to mind her business.
āIf not that the money of this year has been delayed, Iām sure we wouldnāt be here today. Because we could have paid out some of these liabilities. But since this year, no project money has been released to any ministry. And that was a constraint,ā she said.
A Member of the Committee, Hon. Marie Nenemete Ebikake (PDP, Bayelsa), however, questioned the Minister on the African First Lady Peace Mission project of about N500 million, asking her to tell lawmakers how the money was utilised, where the project was located and those involved.
āHonourable Minister and Permanent Secretary with DFA, last time when we came, that was on Thursday, we did raise an issue of African First Lady Peace Mission projects. Unfortunately, we didnāt get any concrete answer to the issue.
āIt was carried over to today. So now that we are here, Honorable Minister, could you please educate the committee on the functions of African First Lady Peace Mission projects, taking into cognizance of funds allocated for the project in the past. Year 2020, 500 million,2021, 225 million.2022, 500 million. 2023, 150 million.Where is the office situated and the organogram,ā she queried.
However, responding, the minister said the N150 million that was appropriated in 2023 was eventually given to the former First Lady, Aisha Buhari, who eventually told her it was meant for the purchase of generator.
āAbout the First Ladyās funds, the 500 million you were talking about, I wasnāt there when it happened. When I came in, I saw it in the Appropriation Act. And I went to my First Lady (Tinubu). We discussed. She said that particular money was not meant for her. That it was meant for the former First Lady because that was when that money was allocated.
āThe former First Lady later called me and said they wanted to use it and buy generator. And in the process, she was out of the country. It took her a while. She came back, called me, and she brought the person that was going to organise how they would get the generator.
āI introduced that person to the procurement officer then, who is now retired so that they could work it out according to the rules and regulations of procurement. And theyāve been on it. Once in a while, I talk with the First Lady to find out whatās going on. And thatās the last I heard of that.ā
Members of the committee were astonished and wondered that the Minister could not identify the contractors or address of the contractors who executed the African First Lady Peace Mission project.
āLet me explain. My First Lady will tell you, focus on your work. And she focuses on her work. She just advises me. And when they came there, I am not a First Lady and I canāt overstep my bounds.
āAll I went to tell her that there is some amount of money in the Appropriation Act for her office and I went there to tell her. I have no business much to do with First Ladyās buildings. Because I have to only take directives when givenā, the Minister responded harshly.
When asked whether her ministry disbursed public funds on First Ladyās projects, Kennedy-Ohaneye said: āI wonāt answer what is not within my purview. Iām not an accountant to know how much cash they have in their bank statements. All I can see is the appropriation paper, the budget. And it was right there in the budget of last year. It was there.
āI canāt answer that, because I donāt know who requested it was supposed to go to procurement. No First Lady called me. I called. I called. I never said a First Lady called, I called to say this is what I saw on the appropriation paper. That was what I said.
āLet me not be misquoted. Let me not be misquoted. I never said it was meant for the First Lady. I said when I saw for First Ladyās mission, that was the name of the corporation. I donāt know whether it has been used or not. We directed them, anything that will be done is supposed to go through procurement, the normal processā.
Committee further asked the procurement officer in the Ministry to explain to lawmakers how the money was spent but before he could provide detailed response, the Minister chipped in, saying, āI am not getting very comfortable anymore. Because I donāt even understand this question.
āThe procurement do their job. I donāt get myself involved. If anything has been going through on that, itās supposed to go through the normal process. I donāt get myself involved.ā
As the drama ensued, Chairman of the Committee, Hon. Kafilat Ogbara,
said, due to the confrontation from the Minister to the Lawmakers, the investigative hearing should be adjourned indefinitely.
She described the attitude of the Minister as rude and insulting to the parliament and said the committee would report to the House that the Minister was uncooperative and had no regard for the legislature.